Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

You are here:
Contact Us

Property Details for Shelbyville Service Station


On this page:


Legal Notices

Profile Information

Private
123420
201 N. Jackson Shelbyville, MO 63469
.5
39.8071 / -92.0417
6
Moreno Lahm, Alma
Moreno-Lahm.Alma@epa.gov
913-551-7380


Top of Page

Property Location



Top of Page

Property Progress


Top of Page

CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Missouri Department of Natural Resources4W97798801MOSection 128(a) State/Tribal2022
Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesRP98727707MOSection 128(a) State/Tribal2021
Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesBF98788901MOAssessment2007


Top of Page

Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Cleanup Planning$1,723.5108/02/202308/28/2023Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesN
Phase I Environmental Assessment$1,622.7508/20/201010/18/2010Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesYFY24
Phase I Environmental Assessment$2,117.5011/16/202212/16/2022Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesN
Phase II Environmental Assessment$5,260.0010/18/201002/24/2011Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesN
Phase II Environmental Assessment$11,201.0003/22/202304/24/2023Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesN


Is Cleanup Necessary? Yes
EPA Assessment Funding: $21,924.76
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $21,924.76


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page

Contaminants and Media


Asbestos
Lead
Petroleum Products
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
Building Materials
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up


Top of Page

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented:
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .5
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page

Institutional and Engineering Controls

Yes
Proprietary Controls
No
U
No


Top of Page

Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page

Additional Property Attributes

This approximately 1/2 acre site was used as a service station from 1930 to 1985. There is a 2000 square-foot building in poor condition on-site. Underground storage tanks remain on-site. The Shelbyville County Commission would like to purchase the site and redevelop it as a new county jail

The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment found the following Recognized Environmental Conditions: a hydraulic lift inside the building, two 500 gallon underground storage tanks with associated piping, one one-thousand gallon above ground storage tank and possible lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos-containing material (ACM) inside the building.

Soil and groundwater was sampled in the areas of the underground storage tanks (USTs), pump island, hydraulic lift, and above-ground storage tank. The building was sampled for asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP). Elevated levels of contaminants associated with gasoline were found in surface soil in the vicinity of the USTs and pump island. These contaminants exceeded the lowest risk-based target levels, although they do not exceed residential standards for contaminants in surface soil. ACM was positively identified in exterior window frame glazing material, and LBP was positively identified in interior paint.

A new Phase I was conducted in 2022. The previously identified impact from historical on-site filling/service station operations, including the two underground storage tanks (USTs) remaining at the site, is considered a recognized environmental condition (REC). Potential impact from other indicator contaminants (e.g. chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with former on-site auto service operations is considered a REC. One 280-gallon buried gasoline tank was depicted along the south site boundary on a 1916 Sanborn amp. By 1928, the site was being used as an auto sales/auto repair garage/filling station with three gasoline tanks depicted along the south site boundary. It is unknown if these tanks were removed or remain at the site. Potential impact from these tanks is considered a REC.

To assess current conditions, a new Phase II was conducted. Eleven volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in the surface soil samples and fourteen VOCs were detected in subsurface soils. All of the compounds are associated with petroleum-based fuels except acetone, a common laboratory contaminant. Concentrations of four VOCs in one surface soil sample exceeded the Missouri Risk-Based Corrective Action (MRBCA) Lowest Default Target Levels (DTLs)-1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, naphthalene, n-hexane, and n-propylbenzene. Naphthalene also exceeded the MRBCA Lowest DTL in another soil sample and two subsurface soil samples. None of the detected VOCs exceeded the MRBCA Residential Risk-Based Target Levels (RBTLs). Concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-Gasoline Range Organics (TPH-GRO) were detected above the MRBCA Lowest DTL in two subsurface soil samples at 768 and 2,600 mg/kg.; however, both concentrations were below the MRBCA Tier 1 Residential RBTLs.
Arsenic and lead were detected at concentrations that exceeded the MRBCA lowest DTLs in most samples, however, the concentrations were within the background concentrations of Shelby County soils.

An ABCA was conducted. Alternative #2: Removal of two underground storage tanks (USTs) and asbestos containing window glazing is the preferred method to remove exposure risks to subsequent construction workers and occupants of the site is the preferred alternative. Asbestos-containing material and lead-based paint should be properly abated prior to demolition of the building.
Commercial (.5)


Top of Page

Release 3.0.2