Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Private
139441
2232 Thurman Ave St. Louis, MO 63110
.13
14922000010
38.6112576 / -90.2511325
1
Eaton, Brad
Eaton.Brad@epa.gov
913-551-7265


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesRP98727703MOSection 128(a) State/Tribal2009
Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesBF98788901MOAssessment2007
St. Louis Development Corporation2B97708601MOBCRLF2009


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$1,834.0011/01/201002/10/2011Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesYFY12
Phase II Environmental Assessment$7,722.3004/13/201105/26/2011Missouri Department of Natural Resources


Is Cleanup Necessary? Yes
EPA Assessment Funding: $9,556.30
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $9,556.30


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


Asbestos
Petroleum Products
VOCs
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
Ground Water
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up

Cleanup Activities

Start DateEPA FundingCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Cleanup Documentation
09/19/2012$30,251.0001/04/2013St. Louis Development CorporationYes


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented:
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .13
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding: $30,251.00
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding: $30,251.00


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

Yes
Proprietary Controls
No
U
No


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

Start DateLeveraged FundingCACompletion Date
04/01/2013$130,000.00St. Louis Development Corporation04/01/2014


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

"The following RECs are present at the Property: 1)The historical operations at the Property that include a gasoline service station and automobile repair shop are considered RECs requiring additional investigation due to the pump island, buried piping system, four USTs, and hydraulic lift, remnants of each which are still visible at the Property. 2) The thick, peeling paint coatings inside the service station structure are considered as possible lead-based paint (LBP). A thorough inspection and sampling of all suspect materials is recommended prior to demolition in order to ensure no asbestos containing material (ACM) is present. A Phase II environmental assessment will be conducted by the departments contractor."

Former Use: The site has been a vacant lot for over 20 years. A gas station was located at the site historically. A catering company is planning to move into the building once the site is remediated and rehabbed. On September 10, 2012, SLDC entered into a subagreement with Garden District Commission for an amount up to 28,000 for tank and contamination removal at the site.

A Phase II was conducted in 2011:

The assessment revealed the following information with regard to the RECs in connection with the site.
* Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks (USTs): The investigation indicates that there is concentrations above Missouri Risk Based Corrective Action (MRBCA) default target levels (DTLs) present near the surface and at a 7-foot depth below ground near the USTs. The concentration of benzene and total petroleum hydrocarbons-gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO) in the subsurface was above residential residential risk based target levels (RBTLs), but below construction worker RBTLs. It is Barr's opinion that due to the age of the tanks and the sampling results, the operation of the USTs did result in a release of gasoline that has migrated from the UST locations.

* Pump Island/Piping: Concentrations of TPH-GRO, naphthalene, benzene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes were above DTLs in the surface soil samples. Concentrations of TPH-GRO, naphthalene, and benzene in the subsurface depths were above DTLs and benzene was above non-residential RBTLs, which appears indicative of a significant release. The area of the pump island has volatile contaminants at levels exceeding RBTLs, so this area does not appear to be safe for any future development without a remedial action. Currently, it is not known how far east, west, or south from the pump islands the VOC contamination extends at levels above RBTLs for indoor inhalation.

* Hydraulic Lift: There were concentrations of TPH-diesel range organics/oil range organics (DRO/ORO) detected in both the surface soil sample and the subsurface soil sample below the MRBCA DTLs and do not appear indicative of a significant release of hydraulic oil in this area of the site. No staining was evident and Barr would expect heavier oil presence if there had been a significant release of hydraulic oil.


* Used Oil UST: Neither the sampling of the surface soil or the subsurface soil at this location revealed that a significant release of used oil had likely occurred. Both surface and subsurface soil samples had reported non-detects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavier petroleum.

* Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM): Asbestos was found in the glazing material of the two exterior windows and the bottom layer of the roofing coating material. The verified ACM should be considered as potentially friable and properly handled during any demolition involving removal of the confirmed ACM. Barr has approximated that there are two windows with ACM on their frames and 1,250 square-foot of roofing material consisting of ACM.

* Lead Based Paint (LBP): None of the exterior paint samples that Barr collected failed the HUD criterion of 5,000 ppm. The white paint found on the interior bathroom is considered as LBP. Any loose or peeling paint observed inside th
Commercial (.13)


Top of Page