Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Wood Estates
Private
237927
15 Wood Circle MATHISTON, MS 39752
73
1
33.5447623 / -89.1260302
1
Nolan, Cindy
Nolan.CindyJ@epa.gov
404-562-8425


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Golden Triangle Planning & Development Inc.4B02D30622MSAssessment2022
Golden Triangle Planning & Development Inc.BF00D60817MSAssessment2017


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$3,142.0008/17/201809/21/2018Golden Triangle Planning & Development Inc.YFY20
Phase I Environmental Assessment$4,117.9007/20/202310/25/2023Golden Triangle Planning & Development Inc.
Phase II Environmental Assessment$23,600.0004/01/202408/16/2024Golden Triangle Planning & Development Inc.


Is Cleanup Necessary? No
EPA Assessment Funding: $30,859.90
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $30,859.90


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate planning or assessment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media



Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info: On April 8, 2024, PM collected two surface water samples (SW-1 and SW-2), two seep water samples (SP 1 and SP-2), and four sediment samples (SED-1 through SED-4) to assess the REC identified in PM's Phase I ESA. The samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and 13-Priority Pollutant List (PPL) metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc). Based on the sheen, foam, and discoloration of the seep water, the surface water and seep water samples were further analyzed for iron and manganese to investigate the potential for naturally occurring impacts. No VOCs or SVOCs were identified in the sediment samples analyzed from the subject property at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) or reporting limits (RLs) and/or applicable screening criteria. Arsenic was detected above the EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) for residential soils and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Tier 1 Target Remediation Goal (TRG) for unrestricted soil in all sediment samples submitted for analysis; however, the concentrations and distribution of arsenic across the subject property suggest that the detected concentrations are consistent with background arsenic concentrations, and not as a result of contamination from a release that may have impacted the subject property. No VOCs, SVOCs, or metals were detected in the seep and surface water samples analyzed at concentrations exceeding the laboratory RLs and/or the applicable screening criteria with the exception of manganese and 1-methylnaphthalene in seep water sample SP-2. Seep water sample SP-1 exhibited elevated concentrations of iron, and sample SP-2 exhibited elevated concentrations of both iron and manganese. It is the opinion of PM that the discoloration and physical properties of the observed seep water at the subject property are a result of naturally elevated iron and manganese levels along with the presence of iron-oxidizing bacteria. There is no known significant on- or off-site source for 1-methylnaphthalene in SP-2 based on historical research completed for the site and adjoining properties during the Phase I ESA. It is likely that the source of the 1-methylnaphthalene in SP-2 is an incidental release from a combustion source at the surface. It is noted that 1-methylnaphthalene was not detected in SP 1, or the surface water samples collected at the subject property. Furthermore, drinking water is supplied to the site via piped water from the local utility and no potable water wells were identified on the site; therefore, exposure to groundwater is not a complete pathway at the subject property. Based on this information and the apparent localized nature of the constituent, it does not appear that the presence of 1-methylnaphthalene in SP-2 presents an unacceptable risk for future receptors on the subject property. The REC associated with the subject property identified in PM's October 2023 Phase I ESA has been adequately assessed. Based on the current use and identified exposure pathways at the subject property, no further investigation is warranted.
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: 73
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate demolition or cleanup activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
No
No
No


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate redevelopment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

Former Use: Standard and other historical sources were able to document that the subject property was developed in 1915 with the current Wood Hall building (Building 13 on Figure 3). The property was occupied by various learning institutions (high school, junior college, and college) with several additional buildings constructed between 1936 and 1996 to complete to the current layout. The learning institutions ceased operations in 2003 and a small portion of the campus remained in use by a religious organization until 2008. One building on the property (labeled as Building 9 on Figure 3) has been occupied by the Webster County Emergency 911 Center since approximately 2010. The residence in the northeastern portion (Building 3) has been used as a rental residence since approximately 2011. The remainder of the property was then unoccupied until 2011 when portions of the campus were lightly renovated for use as a temporary high school since the city?s high school was demolished in a tornado. The use by the high school ceased in 2013 and the property has been mostly unoccupied (except for Building 9, as previously discussed) since that time except for buildings being rented for special events. One of the buildings on the subject property was used as a maintenance building (Building 12). Based on the layout of the building, it appears that it was used for storage of maintenance equipment. There are no lifts or evidence of former lifts within the building which would indicate vehicle maintenance had been performed onsite. Additionally, no floor drains or staining were observed in the building. Based on the likely use for storage of maintenance equipment and the lack of staining or floor drains, PM has not identified this use as a REC.

2023 Phase I ESA: A 6.92-acre portion of a larger 18-acre parent parcel

Standard and other historical resources were able to document that the subject property was vacant and wooded land from at least 1952 until between 2004 and 2006 when the southern portion was cleared and driveways were constructed from the south and east adjoining properties. A pond and associated tributaries were visible in the central portion traversing to the south until the property was cleared for residential development in early 2023.

PM observed a flowing seep in the south central portion of the property that consisted of an unidentified dark reddish gray to black, low viscosity liquid. The seep had a neutral/earthy odor and did not have a strong/noxious odor. Based on information from the current owner, he has no knowledge of the source of the seep. Based on visual observations with observed discolorations, the potential exists for contamination to be present.
Commercial (73)


Top of Page