Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Government
244932
401 Main St. TOLEDO, OH 43605
.27
17-03234
41.64599801956024 / -83.52049904108071
9
Stimple, Bradley
stimple.brad@epa.gov
440-250-1717


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
City of ToledoBF00E02360OHAssessment2018


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$14,000.0011/02/202012/31/2020City of ToledoYFY21
Phase II Environmental Assessment$6,100.0001/26/202102/25/2021City of ToledoN


Is Cleanup Necessary? Yes
EPA Assessment Funding: $20,100.00
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $20,100.00


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


Asbestos
Petroleum Products
VOCs
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
Air
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .27
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

U
U


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

The Subject Property was developed for commercial purposes with the construction of the current Subject Building in 1913. The Subject Building was used as an automotive service garage, masonic temple, Christian reading room, church,printing company, furniture stores, auto supply, accounting firm, law office, paintball facility, realtor office, and music shop.

Printing presses in the 30s-40s used chlorinated solvents, aromatic compounds and several other chemicals within their printing processes. The use of the Subject Property as a printing facility for approximately 20 years is considered a REC. The likely presence of lead based paint is high. CEC observed cracking, flaking and peeling paint throughout the building indicative of lead-based paints. Paint chips were noted on the floor and within debris throughout the structure.

The Phase II data indicate that sub-slab vapor from beneath the Site building (REC-1 and REC-2) contains a number of organic constituents including likely solvents and petroleum-based compounds. Several VOCs were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective VAP Residential and/or Commercial / Industrial Indoor Air Standards.

MSG used the U.S. EPA VISL Calculator to further evaluate the sub-slab vapor analytical results and identify if the detected VOCs suggest a potential risk to indoor air via the vapor intrusion pathway. The VISL-calculated indoor air concentrations for 1,2-dibromethane, chloroform, and TCE were above their respective VAP Residential Indoor Air Standards, but below their respective VAP Commercial / Industrial Air Standards. The calculated cumulative carcinogenic risk is above the target threshold risk for the residential receptor, but below the target threshold risk for the commercial receptor. Additionally, the calculated cumulative non-carcinogenic hazard quotients were above the target threshold risk and hazard value for the residential receptor, but below the target threshold risk and hazard value for the commercial receptor. Therefore, the calculated VISL data suggest that there is a potential risk to indoor air for residential receptors, but not for commercial receptors at the Site. However, it is important to note that the VISL Calculator is a conservative modeling program. Accordingly, indoor air sampling would be necessary to verify the calculated VISL results and determine if the detected VOCs in sub-slab vapor pose a verified risk to indoor air via the vapor intrusion pathway.
Commercial (.27)
Hazardous


Top of Page