Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

You are here:
Contact Us

Property Details for Vacant Apartments


On this page:


Legal Notices

Profile Information

257259
3891 Northview Drive JACKSON, MS 39206
3
54-72-1
32.348105072911 / -90.178546210371
2
Janovitz, Sara
Janovitz.Sara@epa.gov
404-562-9870


Top of Page

Property Location



Top of Page

Property Progress


Top of Page

CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
CENTRAL MS PLANNING & DEVBF02D30522MSAssessment2022


Top of Page

Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$5,837.2509/08/202301/15/2024CENTRAL MS PLANNING & DEVYFY25
Phase II Environmental Assessment$8,385.0009/08/202312/26/2023CENTRAL MS PLANNING & DEVN


Is Cleanup Necessary? Unknown
EPA Assessment Funding: $14,222.25
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $14,222.25


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page

Contaminants and Media




Top of Page

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented:
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: 3
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page

Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
No


Top of Page

Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page

Additional Property Attributes

From at least 1903 to 1908, the subject property was undeveloped. There is a 38-year gap between available historical documents. The 1908 topographic map depicts the subject property as undeveloped, and the 1946 fire insurance map depicts the subject property as developed with a dwelling. Based on the rural location of the subject property during the aforementioned time period, it is unlikely that industrial or commercial activities were performed between 1908 and 1946. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the subject property was either undeveloped or developed with residences between 1908 and 1946. From 1946 to 1962, the subject property was developed with separate dwellings. In 1963, the existing apartment buildings were constructed. The subject property is currently developed with vacant apartment buildings.
The northern adjoining property was undeveloped from at least 1903 to circa 1967. By 1967 the northern adjoining property had been developed with the existing apartment
complex. The eastern and southern adjoining properties were undeveloped from at least 1903 to between 1908 and 1946. From at least 1946 to present, the eastern and southern adjoining properties were developed with separate dwellings. The western adjoining property was undeveloped from at least 1903 to 1982. In 1984 the western adjoining property was developed with the existing storage unit facility.

This assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions (REC), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CREC), and/or significant data gaps (SDG) in connection with the subject property.

The ACM survey was performed on October 30, 2023, by a PPM (www.ppmco.com) State of Mississippi Certified Asbestos Inspector (proof of certification provided in Appendix B). PPM's scope of work included a visual survey and sampling of accessible suspect ACMs on the interior and exterior areas of the building. The inspection included a visual assessment of suspect ACMs and subsequent sampling and analysis. According to the analytical results, 62 of the 101 samples collected were identified to
contain asbestos. This conclusion is based on the EPA definition of an ACM as material composed of ".greater than 1% asbestos."

� Apartment C5 -
- Off-white 9"x9" Floor Tile and Black Mastic (01 and 02). The off-white 9"x9" floor tile and black mastic are located in the interior of apartment C5. The floor tile contains 2 percent chrysotile asbestos, and the black mastic contains 8 percent chrysotile asbestos.
- Sheetrock and Joint Compound (06 and 07). The sheetrock (non-ACM) and joint compound are located in the interior of apartment C5. The joint compound contains 3 percent chrysotile asbestos.
- White Ceiling Texture and Sheetrock (08 through 10). The white ceiling texture and sheetrock (non-ACM) are located in the interior of apartment C5. The white ceiling texture contains 4 percent chrysotile asbestos.

� Apartment C6
- Off-white 9"x9" Floor Tile and Black Mastic (11 and 12). The off-white 9"x9" floor tile and black mastic are located in the interior of apartment C6. The floor tile contains 2 percent chrysotile asbestos, and the black mastic contains 8 percent chrysotile asbestos.
- Yellow Linoleum Flooring, Black Mastic, and White Floor Tile (13 and 14). The yellow linoleum flooring (non-ACM), associated black mastic, and associated white floor tile are located in the interior of apartment C6. The black mastic contains 6 percent chrysotile asbestos, and the white floor tile associated with the yellow linoleum flooring contains 2 percent chrysotile asbestos.
- Sheetrock and Joint Compound (15 through 17). The sheetrock (non-ACM) and joint compound are located in the interior of apartment C6. The joint compound contains 2 percent chrysotile asbestos.
- White Ceiling Texture (18 and 19). The white ceiling texture is located in the interior of apartment C6 and contains 3 percent chrysotile asbestos.

� Apartment C1
- Off-whit


Top of Page

Release 3.0.2