Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

1701 Woodbridge Street
Private
258789
1701 Woodbridge Street JACKSON, MI 49203
.49
4-183100000
42.228868986587 / -84.413139039843
5
Didier, Matt
Didier.Matthew@epa.gov
312-353-2112


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
City of JacksonBF00E03212MIAssessment2022


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Cleanup Planning$11,452.9501/15/202402/12/2024City of Jackson
Phase I Environmental Assessment$3,500.0012/22/202301/19/2024City of JacksonYFY24
Phase II Environmental Assessment$12,567.5601/15/202402/12/2024City of Jackson


Is Cleanup Necessary? No
EPA Assessment Funding: $27,520.51
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $27,520.51


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate planning or assessment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


VOCs
NOT Cleaned up
Ground Water
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info: Actionable levels of PCE have been detected in the soil, groundwater, and soil vapors around the building and under its slab. PFE test results demonstrated that the soils beneath the building are conducive to vapor extraction. Fishbeck has prepared a conceptual VIMS design model. Conceptual costs for the recommended VIMS are $75,000 for installation, startup, and first year of operation (including one assumed carbon changeout).
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .49
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate demolition or cleanup activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
Yes
Other SSD system is in place
No


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate redevelopment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

The Subject Property consists of one legal parcel occupying approximately 0.491 acres. The Subject Property is currently developed with a single-story, flat-roofed structure formerly used for laundromat and dry-cleaner operations.

The first known use of the Subject Property Fishbeck was able to determine was a machining business that operated from at least 1899 to 1930, predating the earliest available record. The shop also featured a painting area, woodworking space, a blacksmith, and associated offices. The building that housed these occupants had a coal bin on the southwestern portion of the structure. A warehouse structure was standing on the eastern portion of the parcel at the same time. In the early 1900s, portions of the warehouse structure were converted into work areas for varnishing, painting, and assembling products. By 1930, the structure on the western portion of the Subject Property had been repurposed into a laundromat that operated on the first floor and a used furniture shop that operated on the second floor; the building to the east was left vacant. Before 1950, the structure on the eastern portion of the Subject Property had been razed from the site. In the 1950s and 1960s, a carpet service business also operated out of the Subject Property. Between 1963 and 1970, the structure on the Subject Property was left vacant. By 1970, that structure had been demolished to make way for the laundromat building currently present on the Subject Property. The structure was operated by Bre-Z-Coin Wash & Dry Cleaner until 2014. Since Bre-Z-Coin left the Subject Property, it has remained vacant.

The Phase I ESA identified the following Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the Site:
* The structure present on the Subject Property was formerly operated as a dry cleaner from approximately 1970 to 2014. The structure at the Subject Property has a dry-cleaning machine inside that features a sticker noting the machine's use of stabilized perchloroethylene. The long-term and high-frequency use of chlorinated solvents at the Subject Property represents a significant chance of impacting the soil and groundwater and is therefore a REC.
* The Subject Property was first developed with a structure on the western portion of the property. This structure was used as a machine shop from at least 1899 to approximately 1930. From approximately 1930 to 1963, this structure was used for laundromat and dry-cleaning purposes. These former uses associated with the structure represent a REC at the Subject Property.
* The northern adjoining property located at 260 West Euclid Avenue is currently occupied by J & J Industries, a CNC machining shop, and was formerly occupied by King Paul & Associates, a plastic products manufacturer. These light industrial uses may have impacted the subsurface conditions at that site. In addition, this site is hydrologically upgradient from the Subject Property and is listed on the underground storage tank (UST) database. Because of the lack of verification sample documentation, a release from the former UST cannot be ruled out. The possibility exists for contamination from this site to migrate onto the Subject Property; therefore, this site represents a REC at the Subject Property. However, the User would not be liable for contamination migrating onto the Subject Property from an offsite source.

PCE was detected in soil and groundwater samples exceeding Part 201 GRCC during the January 2024 Phase II ESA investigation. In addition, PCE was detected in soil gas samples detected above EGLE VIASLs. The highest PCE concentrations exist near the northern wall of the building, near a dry-cleaning machine. Therefore, based on the Phase II ESA, the Site is considered a facility.
Commercial (.49)


Top of Page