Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Private
260028
280 W Muskegon Avenue MUSKEGON, MI 49440
.28
61-24-205-334-0007-00
43.233344989472 / -86.250623961096
3
Didier, Matt
Didier.Matthew@epa.gov
312-353-2112


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce Foundation, INCBF00E03215MIAssessment2022


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$3,000.0003/20/202405/02/2024Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce Foundation, INCYFY24
Phase II Environmental Assessment$7,984.3704/09/202405/02/2024Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce Foundation, INCN


Is Cleanup Necessary? No
EPA Assessment Funding: $10,984.37
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $10,984.37


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate planning or assessment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


Unknown

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .28
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate demolition or cleanup activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
There is an AUL on site due to contamination from an adjoining property. It states that for additional development of this property, the potential for vapor intrusion must be evaluated. As of May 2024, this has been evaluated. No COCs were detected over EGLE VISLs.


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate redevelopment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

The Subject Property consists of one legal parcel occupying approximately 0.28 acres. The Subject Property is currently developed with a vacant, two-story structure with a basement most recently utilized as the Central United Methodist Church. The main floor is used for offices and classrooms, the upper level is used for religious services, and the basement is utilized as a utility room.

The Subject Property was developed prior to 1911 for use as a single residential dwelling. This dwelling was razed in the late 1920s, and the structure currently present on the Subject Property was constructed in 1930. The building was first occupied by 1st Church of Christ Scientist. Since 1930 the Subject Property has been utilized as a church.

The Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) or HRECs. No CRECs were identified in connection with the property except for the following:
* The southeastern adjoining property has operated as a gasoline filling station since at least 1964. During the removal of several USTs from the site, a release of gasoline was confirmed. Groundwater contamination from this adjoining site has migrated onto the Subject Property. As part of the closure of the adjoining LUST site, a Groundwater Restrictive Covenant was filed on the Subject Property. The existing contamination on the Subject Property (from an off-Site source) and its approved regulatory closure under institutional control represents a CREC at the Subject Property.

Fishbeck's primary focus was determining if soil vapor impact existed. We were almost entirely non-detect for VOCs through the building, with a few very low detections, all well below VISLs.
Commercial (.28)


Top of Page