Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

You are here:
Contact Us

Property Details for Daelyte Yards


On this page:


Legal Notices

Profile Information

Private
263087
1354 - 1374 Mount Elliott DETROIT, MI 48207
.7
1501390811, 15013912
42.350048004813 / -83.013527003589
13
Didier, Matt
Didier.Matthew@epa.gov
312-353-2112


Top of Page

Property Location



Top of Page

Property Progress


Top of Page

CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
County of Wayne4B00E03553MIAssessment2023


Top of Page

Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase II Environmental Assessment$29,050.0011/19/202402/02/2025County of WayneYFY25


Is Cleanup Necessary? Yes
EPA Assessment Funding: $29,050.00
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $29,050.00


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment.


Top of Page

Contaminants and Media


VOCs
NOT Cleaned up


Top of Page

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: .7
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page

Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
Yes
Engineered Barriers (e.g., Slurry Walls, Sheet)
Based on its status as a "facility," potential future owners/operators of the subject property are eligible to conduct a BEA prior to or within 45 days of initial ownership or operation, to obtain liability protection for existing contamination from the state of Michigan. A BEA must be submitted to EGLE within six months of initial ownership/operation, whichever occurs first.

Additional Site Assessment and Evaluation of the Vapor Intrusion (VI) Pathway

A concentration of TCE was detected in one soil sample (SB-16 at 12.0-14.0 feet bgs), which exceeds the Residential and Nonresidential VIAP screening levels and represents a potential vapor intrusion risk. This sample was collected in the area of the former industrial building and is located within an applicable 100-foot lateral inclusion zone for vapor intrusion risk relative to all three building structures at the property.

Additional assessment of the vapor intrusion pathway is recommended via the installation and sampling of soil gas monitoring points and laboratory analysis of soil gas for VOCs, to determine whether soil gas concentrations are present beneath the industrial building and/or proximal to the onsite residential structures, which represent an inhalation exposure risk to property occupants.

If elevated soil gas concentrations are identified that exceed the applicable EGLE Residential and Nonresidential VIAP screening levels and/or site-specific Volatilization to Indoor Air Criteria issued by EGLE, additional assessment will be completed or vapor mitigation controls will be implemented, as appropriate based on the results of the soil gas sampling.

UST Removal or In-Place Closure

As indicated in Section 4.2, the presence of three out-of-use USTs was confirmed at the property, which should be removed or property closed in accordance with Michigan Part 211, Michigan's Storage and Handling of Flammable and Combustible Liquids (FL/CL) rules, and other applicable regulations.

Because the 1,000-gallon gasoline and 6,000-gallon mineral spirits USTs at the property are regulated USTs under Michigan Part 211 and are not in use, those tanks should be properly registered with the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs - Bureau of Fire Services (BFS). A submittal of a determination and financial responsibility form and a Request for Determination of Eligibility for the use of the Michigan Underground Storage Tank Authority (MUSTA) as financial responsibility should also be completed. A Notice of Intent of Removal should be submitted to BFS, the contents of the USTs should be characterized and removed for proper disposal, the USTs removed from the ground, and UST Site Assessment and reporting conducted in accordance with the requirements of Michigan Part 211 and the Michigan Underground Storage Tank Rules.

Heating/fuel oil USTs used for onsite consumptive (i.e., heating) purposes are not regulated under Michigan Part 211. However, as the current contents of the heating oil UST and the condition/integrity of the UST itself are unknown, the contents of the UST should be characterized and removed for proper disposal, and the UST shell cleaned and closed in place using inert materials.
No


Top of Page

Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page

Additional Property Attributes

PM compared the analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during site investigation activities with the EGLE Generic Cleanup Criteria and Screening Levels as presented in Part 201 Rules 299.1 through 299.50, dated October 13, 2024 entitled "Cleanup Criteria Requirements for Response Activity", in accordance with Section 20120a(1) using the Residential and Nonresidential cleanup criteria. PM also compared the soil and groundwater results with the EGLE Volatilization to Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP) screening levels (updated February 2024).
Under Part 201, a background concentration of a hazardous substance that exists in the environment at or regionally proximate to a facility that is not attributable to any release at or regionally proximate to the facility may be substituted for a generic cleanup criterion when the background concentration is higher than a criterion. Therefore, when concentrations were higher than the Part 201 Cleanup Criteria, metals were also compared to the Statewide Default Background Levels (SDBLs) and to the Regional Background Levels (RBLs) for clay and sand soil types (as appropriate) from the Huron-Erie Glacial Lobe (2015 Background Soil Survey), and PM defaulted to whichever value was greater.
Soil analytical results identified trichloroethene (TCE) in SB-16 (12.0-14.0 feet bgs) at a concentration exceeding the EGLE Residential and Nonresidential VIAP screening levels, which are representative of a potential vapor intrusion risk in that area.

No other concentrations of VOCs were detected exceeding the laboratory MDLs and/or the most restrictive Part 201 Residential and Nonresidential cleanup criteria in the remaining soil samples analyzed.

No concentrations of PNAs, PCBs, and/or Chromium VI were detected exceeding laboratory MDLs in any of the soil samples analyzed.

Concentrations of various metals were detected in each of the samples analyzed above the laboratory MDLs, but the detected concentrations are within the SDBLs and/or RBLs, and did not exceed the most restrictive Part 201 Residential and Nonresidential cleanup criteria and screening levels.

The PFAS compound perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) was detected in SB-20 (3.5-4.5 feet bgs. However, no Part 201 soil cleanup criteria currently exist for PFOS.

Groundwater analytical results identified a concentration of total xylenes in TMW-7 in excess of the laboratory MDLs, but not exceeding the most restrictive Part 201 Residential and Nonresidential cleanup criteria and screening levels. No other concentrations of VOCs or PNAs were identified exceeding the laboratory MDLs.

The following exposure pathways were evaluated, including groundwater ingestion, soil leaching to groundwater, groundwater surface water interface, direct contact, and ambient and indoor air inhalation from contaminated soil and groundwater. Exposure pathways are eliminated when they are determined not to be relevant, or it is demonstrated that unacceptable exposures do not exist and that response activities are not required to prevent or mitigate unacceptable exposures.

The subject property is currently zoned M-2 Restricted Industrial District, which is consistent with a Nonresidential property use in accordance with MDEQ Part 201. However, based on the current and intended use of the subject property for residential purposes, the Part 201 Residential cleanup criteria are applicable.

Complete and/or Potentially Complete Exposure Pathway?
Pathway Yes/No Justification
Groundwater Ingestion
(DWP/DW) No * The property is connected to municipal water and no potable or other water supply wells exist or will be installed.
Surface Water
(GSIP/GSI) No * No surface water is present on or adjacent to the subject property.
* No storm sewers are present within the impacted area of the subject property.
Indoor Air Inhalation
(SVII/VIAP) Yes * Building structures are present.
* TCE was detected in one soil sample (SB-16 at 12.0-1
Industry (.7)


Top of Page

Release 3.0.2