Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Profile Information

Private
254614
916 Oine Road NORLINA, NC 27563
1.5
2929654505
36.482686990165476 / -78.22916701353581
1
Nolan, Cindy
Nolan.CindyJ@epa.gov
404-562-8425


Top of Page


Property Location



Top of Page


Property Progress


Top of Page


CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Warren Co - County of WarrenBF02D32222NCAssessment2022


Top of Page


Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$5,500.0012/13/202202/14/2023Warren Co - County of WarrenYFY23
Phase II Environmental Assessment$78,000.0010/18/2023Warren Co - County of Warren


Is Cleanup Necessary? No
EPA Assessment Funding: $83,500.00
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $83,500.00


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
Phase I and Phase II ESAs that consider impacts from extreme weather events and natural disastersPhase I ESAs may consider current and on-going impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters and consider future impacts to the site or area. For example, an investigation of the site history can include an investigation of site vulnerabilities based on historical and recent extreme weather patterns and events (e.g., floods and drought). Phase II ESAs may include use of renewable energy, incorporating remote sensing capabilities, maximize reuse of existing wells (as appropriate) and/or design wells for future reuse, use of field test kits when possible, use of local laboratories when possible, and use of appropriate sized equipment for the project.
Identify potential risk factors and infrastructure or utility vulnerabilitiesIdentify potential risk factors and infrastructure or utility vulnerabilities resulting directly from the impacts of increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and natural disasters. Possible risk factors and vulnerabilities may include proximity to the ocean, infrastructure vulnerabilities, property affected by a revised FEMA flood plain, drought monitor, or wildfire risk map, vulnerability related to changes in frequency and intensity of precipitation events, vulnerability of soil type due to moisture and hydraulic changes, and ground and surface drinking water vulnerabilities.


Top of Page


Contaminants and Media


Lead
NOT Cleaned up
Drinking Water
NOT Cleaned up

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented:
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: 1.5
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page


Institutional and Engineering Controls

No
No


Top of Page


Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page


Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation – Redevelopment


Top of Page


Additional Property Attributes

The property owner Patsy Rooker inherited the property from a relative, Mr. James Thomas Burton. The Subject Property consists of approximately 1.5 acres and is developed with 1,300 square foot building formerly used as a service station and convenience store. Land use at the Subject Property has been confirmed back to 1950, when the Subject Property appears to have been partially developed as agricultural land. The present day Texaco service station was the Subject Property's first developed use and operated from approximately 1968 through 1985. Following the closure of the service station, the Subject Property operated as an antique shop for several years and has remained vacant since its closure in the 1990s. The property has not operated as a gas station or service station since Mrs. Rooker inherited the property in the early 2000s. The Phase I ESA noted the following RECs: The historical automobile service operations for approximately 20 years at the Subject Property; The historical operation of a gasoline filling station and the historical presence of two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs and one 500-gallon unleaded gasoline UST at the Subject Property; and the presence of a 500-gallon waste oil UST at the Subject Property. The GPR survey conducted as part of this Phase I ESA identified a waste oil UST and a larger previously unknown UST. Future uses for this property have not yet been determined.

The Phase II ESA at the site noted the following: no TPH-DRO/GRO, EPH, or VPH compounds were detected in soil samples collected to evaluate the former USTs and UST system; no SVOCs or PCBs detected in the analyzed soil samples; arsenic was detected in four soil samples at concentrations above the Residential Health-Based PSRG but below the average levels of naturally occurring arsenic in North Carolina; minor concentrations of VOCs were detected in groundwater samples, no exceedances of regulatory levels; lead was detected in the sample collected from the on-site water supply well; minor concentrations of VOCs were detected in sub-slab soil gas, no exceedances of regulatory levels; no exceedances for calculated risk scenarios. Based on the Phase II ESA data, current site conditions do not pose a risk to commercial or residential redevelopment of the site.
Commercial (1.5)


Top of Page