Skip to Main Content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

You are here:
Contact Us

Property Details for 1049 Rooker Dairy Road


On this page:


Legal Notices

Profile Information

Private
255162
1049 Rooker Dairy Road NORLINA, NC 27563
2.92
2031741220
36.53406998446866 / -78.19289600392473
1
Nolan, Cindy
Nolan.CindyJ@epa.gov
404-562-8425


Top of Page

Property Location



Top of Page

Property Progress


Top of Page

CAs Associated with this Property

CA NameCA #StateTypeAnnouncement Year
Warren Co - County of WarrenBF02D32222NCAssessment2022


Top of Page

Assessment Activities at this Property

ActivityEPA FundingStart DateCompletion DateCAAccomplishment Counted?Counted When?
Phase I Environmental Assessment$4,500.0001/20/202302/28/2023Warren Co - County of WarrenYFY25
Phase II Environmental Assessment$52,000.0007/26/202310/23/2023Warren Co - County of WarrenN


Is Cleanup Necessary? Unknown
EPA Assessment Funding: $56,500.00
Leveraged Funding:
Total Funding: $56,500.00


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Planning or Assessment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
Phase I and Phase II ESAs that consider impacts from extreme weather events and natural disastersPhase I ESAs may consider current and on-going impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters and consider future impacts to the site or area. For example, an investigation of the site history can include an investigation of site vulnerabilities based on historical and recent extreme weather patterns and events (e.g., floods and drought). Phase II ESAs may include use of renewable energy, incorporating remote sensing capabilities, maximize reuse of existing wells (as appropriate) and/or design wells for future reuse, use of field test kits when possible, use of local laboratories when possible, and use of appropriate sized equipment for the project.
Identify potential risk factors and infrastructure or utility vulnerabilitiesIdentify potential risk factors and infrastructure or utility vulnerabilities resulting directly from the impacts of increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and natural disasters. Possible risk factors and vulnerabilities may include proximity to the ocean, infrastructure vulnerabilities, property affected by a revised FEMA flood plain, drought monitor, or wildfire risk map, vulnerability related to changes in frequency and intensity of precipitation events, vulnerability of soil type due to moisture and hydraulic changes, and ground and surface drinking water vulnerabilities.


Top of Page

Contaminants and Media


SVOCs
VOCs
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
Drinking Water
Ground Water
Soil
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up
NOT Cleaned up


Top of Page

Cleanup Activities

There are no current cleanup activities.


Cleanup/Treatment Implemented: N
Cleanup/Treatement Categories:
Addl Cleanup/Treatment info:
Address of Data Source:
Total ACRES Cleaned Up: 2.92
Number of Cleanup Jobs Leveraged:
EPA Cleanup Funding:
Leveraged Funding:
Cost Share Funding:
Total Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup

There is no data for Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Demolition or Cleanup.


Top of Page

Institutional and Engineering Controls

U
U


Top of Page

Redevelopment and Other Leveraged Accomplishments

There are no current redevelopment activities.


Number of Redevelopment Jobs Leveraged:
Actual Acreage of Greenspace Created:
Leveraged Funding:


Top of Page

Climate Adaption and Mitigation - Redevelopment

Selected Strategy(ies)Explanatory Text
N/AThis property does not incorporate redevelopment activities to address impacts from extreme weather events and natural disasters. If no activities were incorporated, select this option.


Top of Page

Additional Property Attributes

The Subject Property consists of approximately 2.92 acres and is developed with a former service station building which is currently vacant. The building is in poor shape with no roof or walls. It should be noted that the Warren County GIS website identifies the Subject Property as an approximately 1.5 acre parcel, while the plat associated with the current deed identifies the parcel as approximately 2.92 acres. The property was partially developed for agricultural land in 1950 and the service station was constructed prior to 1967. Interview info indicates the service station operated from 1965 through 1985. The underground storage tanks (USTs) were reportedly removed in the mid-1980s. Following closure of the service station, the property was used for general office space and a rehabilitation center until 2021.

This PESA revealed the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs): the historical operation of a service station and historical use of petroleum UST system at the Subject Property; and the historical automobile service operations conducted at the Subject Property, including the presence of an in-ground hydraulic vehicle lift, septic system, and floor drain with unknown discharge location located in the former service area. The property was previously owned by Otis Lloyd Jones, and is currently owned by Joseph and Susan Owens out of Chesapeake VA. The Owens intend to develop the site for a boat repair facility.

The Phase II ESA at the site noted the following: petroleum compounds were detected in samples collected from the former UST tank pit and dispenser islands at concentrations exceeding Residential and/or Soil-to-Water MSCCs, but did not exceed Industrial/Commercial MSCCs; PCBs were not detected in the analyzed soil samples; arsenic was detected in five soil samples at concentrations above the Residential Health-Based PSRG and/or the Industrial/Commercial PSRG but below the average levels of naturally occurring arsenic in North Carolina; several VOCs and SVOCs were detected in groundwater samples at concentrations above the NCGQS, GCLs, Residential GWSLs and/or Non-Residential GWSLs; MTBE was detected in the sample collected from the on-site Water Supply Well; the calculated risk scenarios for direct contact with soil did not exceed the established maximums for Non-Residential use; the risk calculations for direct contact with groundwater exceeded the established maximums for both Residential and Non-Residential scenarios; and the calculated risk scenarios for soil gas to indoor air did not indicate unacceptable risk for residential or non-residential uses. Based on the Phase II ESA data, current site conditions do not pose a risk to the proposed commercial redevelopment of the site.
Commercial (.35) Greenspace (2.57)


Top of Page

Release 3.0.2